College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

A vote for a 'Con Con' could have curbed freedoms

By Gabe Kovacs

|

Published: Monday, January 26, 2009

Updated: Monday, January 18, 2010

On December 10, 2008, most students were buried six feet deep in books studying for final exams. Little did they know that something big was happening in the political world that could have been a stepping-stone to changing the United States forever. Ohio state legislators were holding a vote that could have passed a bill calling for a national Constitutional Convention (commonly known as a Con Con). A Con Con is an act in our government that allows the U.S. Constitution to be rewritten or replaced without any restrictions.

Article V of the U.S. Constitution defines when Con Con can be held. There are two ways Congress can vote for a Con Con; either a two-thirds vote from both Houses or if two-thirds of the state legislators pass a bill calling for a Con Con.

Currently, 22 states have a bill calling for a Con Con. Ten states passed a Con Con resolution, but later rescinded it. Seventeen states have not passed anything regarding a Con Con.

Article V and the rest of the U.S. Constitution do not provide much information about how a Constitutional Convention should be held. The only thing known about a Con Con is that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are completely thrown up for grabs, allowing anything or everything to be changed, altered, distorted or deemed obsolete. This power is very dangerous and could completely destroy what America has stood for since 1776: freedom.

The last Con Con was held in 1787, when every state called to replace the Articles of Confederation with a better system of government.

Fifty-five delegates from every state except Rhode Island gathered in Philadelphia to write a new Constitution. Delegates included George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They knew what small changes were needed to create a governing system that worked. Their product of that convention, the U.S. Constitution, has proven itself for over 220 years.

However, in today's world, where the views of the founding fathers are not as strong as they were, a Con Con is not the brightest idea. Washington D.C. is filled with radical liberals and neo-conservatives who do not consider the freedoms of the citizens their first priority. Do the citizens of America really want them to have complete control over the document that gives Americans their freedoms?

During the 1970s, there was a movement in support of a Constitutional Convention. It came down to the wire; 32 states passed bills for a Con Con, just two states away from a convention.

Recently, the call for a modern day Con Con has resurrected from the grave. America is still two states away from having the U.S. Constitution be vulnerable to destruction.

To clarify, 22 states still have their Con Con bills in effect. Even though 10 of the original 32 states rescinded their resolution, they can still be counted as states that call for a convention because Article V is vague. It doesn't specify whether a rescinded bill would be counted or not; and with lawyers finding loopholes everywhere, there is a good chance that these 10 states can be counted.

With 34 being the magic number needed to hold a Con Con, American citizens are only two states away from the possibility of having most of their rights taken away. The states that have not passed any Con Con bill are California, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Connecticut. These states are all possible deciders in changing America forever.

Returning to the Ohio election; the legislation rejected the bill. However, America is still in hot water. If any two of the mentioned states were to pass a Con Con bill, the U.S. Constitution could be distorted beyond all recognition. Imagine America as a nation where people do not have the right to speak freely, the right to defend, the right to privacy, the right to a trial and more. All freedoms are not safe with a modern-day Con Con.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Be the first to comment on this article!







log out