Abstract:
Journalists are entrusted with a huge duty to the people they serve. They are supposed to show what is happening in the most objective way possible. In order to do this, sometimes they have to risk going to some of the most dangerous areas of the world and dealing with some of the most unsavory people when they get there....
Originally posted byEric Beyrich
I have much greater trust and faith in the US Military and the American tribunals than in the stories being told by captured and accused terrorists. Recall that the Taliban / Al Queda used bonefide press agents to infiltrate the Northern Alliance in Afganistan and then used explosive-laided cameras to assassinate the NA leader. Q. Why didn't the press evaluate its roll in aiding terrorisms them? Recall that the current enemy does not abide by any element of the Geneva Convention and regularly murders civilians and uses children as human shields and suicide bombers. Taking their "word" for anything seems like a foolish idea at best, and giving it a broad audience seems dangerous to all freedom loving people hold dear. Indeed, if it were not for the clemency of the US, captured terrorist agents would be brutally killed soon after their capture by local authroies who have had to deal with the aftermath of their murders and mayhem. Hopefully, even the left-leaning journalism schools of American can come to see that they are applying an irrational, double-standard in their treatment of the US and its campaign to protect the free world from those who would destroy it. But them again, if your read the polemics in the NY Times and others, it seems that the press will never learn to stop playing politics with the lives of real people.
Originally posted byelifish
Please bare with me, the world's run amuck! It all starts and ends with the main man. Will bush even let another pres replace him come election?
Eric Beyrich
posted 9/05/07 @ 10:32 AM EST