Quantcast The Daily Campus
College Media Network

The Daily Campus

An Undeserved 'Scarlet Letter' For Sex Offenders

Abstract:
Connecticut Governor, M. Jodi Rell has recently proposed a law that would require registered sex offenders to have a code identifying them as such on either their license or state identification. Though ripe with good intentions, this law unfairly singles out a group of people who have already paid their debt to society and are trying to reintegrate themselves into the mainstream world....

  • Displaying 1 - 9 of 9

Bob Paris

posted 2/21/08 @ 10:16 AM EST

I have to say that I take exception to your story and particularly "they are no less deserving of a second chance in life than a murderer or other convict who has served their debt to society".

A felony in the United States is intended to be the higher category of criminal offenses, as distinct from a misdemeanor, which is intended to be the less serious category of offenses. Crimes commonly considered to be felonies include: aggravated assault and/or battery, arson, burglary, embezzlement, grand theft, treason, espionage, racketeering, robbery, murder, rape, kidnapping and fraud.

By definition Law is a system of rules usually enforced through a set of institutions. The purpose of law is to provide an objective set of rules for governing conduct and maintaining order in a society.

A sex offender is a person who has been criminally charged and convicted of, or has pled guilty to, or pled Nolo contendere to a sex crime. The term sexual offender is a broad term, with sexual predator being used to describe a more severe physical or repeat sexual offense.

Of released sex offenders who committed another sex crime, 40% perpetrated the new offense within a year or less from their prison discharge. See: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm#sex

Bottom line these felons are a threat to American society. They should be removed from the society and not allowed to perpetrate another crime. Any person with any IQ understands right and wrong. A sexual crime is a choice by that individual. A repeat offense is a choice by that person to commit the crime. Since its there choice to commit these crimes, its their choice to not be part of society and should be removed.

Aimee

posted 2/23/08 @ 3:09 PM EST

Your facts are wrong. Go to the Human Rights Watch website or even the US Department of Justice. They have done studies on sex offenders and the recidivism rate is less than 10%. The statistics you might be referring to are rearrest rates. When a sex offender gets arrested for a drug charge, or theft or something non sex related, that is not recidivising. It is a good stat to throw out there to scare people into thinking sex offenders can't ever stop, but is simply not true. In fact only murder has a lower recidivism than sex offenses. Get your facts together before you make statements like this. That is why we have this mess in the first place. No body is using any rational thinking, just knee jerk reactions.



Originally posted by

Bob Paris

I have to say that I take exception to your story and particularly "they are no less deserving of a second chance in life than a murderer or other convict who has served their debt to society".

A felony in the United States is intended to be the higher category of criminal offenses, as distinct from a misdemeanor, which is intended to be the less serious category of offenses. Crimes commonly considered to be felonies include: aggravated assault and/or battery, arson, burglary, embezzlement, grand theft, treason, espionage, racketeering, robbery, murder, rape, kidnapping and fraud.

By definition Law is a system of rules usually enforced through a set of institutions. The purpose of law is to provide an objective set of rules for governing conduct and maintaining order in a society.

A sex offender is a person who has been criminally charged and convicted of, or has pled guilty to, or pled Nolo contendere to a sex crime. The term sexual offender is a broad term, with sexual predator being used to describe a more severe physical or repeat sexual offense.

Of released sex offenders who committed another sex crime, 40% perpetrated the new offense within a year or less from their prison discharge. See: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm#sex

Bottom line these felons are a threat to American society. They should be removed from the society and not allowed to perpetrate another crime. Any person with any IQ understands right and wrong. A sexual crime is a choice by that individual. A repeat offense is a choice by that person to commit the crime. Since its there choice to commit these crimes, its their choice to not be part of society and should be removed.

8th Amendment

posted 2/21/08 @ 1:45 PM EST

This law and laws like it blatantly violate the 8th amendment of the Constitution. "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

Sex offenders can be rehabilitated for release back into society and function fine, but not all of them can be rehabilitated and some have to be in prison for longer (or for life). Help the ones who can be helped and jail the ones who cannot be helped. But, we don't have prison space because >50% of the US prison population is there for drug-related crimes, so free up some of that jail space through drug rehabilitation, which is much more easily accomplished.

I fully agree with the editor here.

Erin

posted 2/21/08 @ 8:57 PM EST

This commentary frightens me. It is yet another example of our tendency to value the rights of criminals over the safety of our citizens. Perhaps you should take into account the horrible mental repercussions associated with being the victim of sexual violence. Maybe you should also consider the extremely high rate sex offenders who become repeat offenders. Sex offenders have made a conscious decision to become such and should therefore be treated accordingly by society. In fact, many of our laws regarding sex offenders are far too lenient.

Sex offenders ruin lives and are likely to do so again. At the very least, they should be identified and recognized in order to prevent causing harm to more innocent individuals. It seems sick and twisted that we should worry about giving these deviant criminals should be given a second chance to start a normal life when their victims may never be able to do so again.

When will we cease to worry about a sex offenders right to "reintegrate" and focus on our own personal right to safe, healthy lives?

Your article was disgusting.

Aimee

posted 2/23/08 @ 12:52 PM EST

It's very irresponsible and make statements that are false and claim them as a fact. Sex offenders do not have an extremely high rate of recidivism. In fact it is lower than any other crime but murder. According to the US Dept. of Justice the recidivism rate is around 8% for sex offenders. It is people like you who spew out lies and myths that have led to this witchhunt and hysteria surrounding sex offenders. Our children are more likely to be abused by someone they already know than they are a sex offender. That's the truth and that is what we should be trying to prevent. Ruining the lives of sex offenders DOES NOTHING to prevent sex abuse. In fact it might make things even worse. Why not ask Patty Wetterling, who started this vendetta when her son Jacob was kidnapped and murdered. She agress that we have gone WAY to far and have lost sight of the goal "no more victims". Demonizing past sex offenders does not accomplish that.





Originally posted by

Erin

This commentary frightens me. It is yet another example of our tendency to value the rights of criminals over the safety of our citizens. Perhaps you should take into account the horrible mental repercussions associated with being the victim of sexual violence. Maybe you should also consider the extremely high rate sex offenders who become repeat offenders. Sex offenders have made a conscious decision to become such and should therefore be treated accordingly by society. In fact, many of our laws regarding sex offenders are far too lenient.

Sex offenders ruin lives and are likely to do so again. At the very least, they should be identified and recognized in order to prevent causing harm to more innocent individuals. It seems sick and twisted that we should worry about giving these deviant criminals should be given a second chance to start a normal life when their victims may never be able to do so again.

When will we cease to worry about a sex offenders right to "reintegrate" and focus on our own personal right to safe, healthy lives?

Your article was disgusting.

By the Book

posted 2/21/08 @ 9:07 PM EST

My older brother slept with his girlfriend when she was only 15 and they got pregnant; now they're married with two beautiful kids. Although he's never been charged with any sexual crime if he had been and had to get "sex offender" on his license I would support it. He knew what he was doing when he chose to have sex and so he should live with the consequences. In the air of fairness anyone convicted of any crime should have it marked on their license or ID (drunk drivers, robbers, murderers, thieves, slanderers, drug offenders); and if you don't like it don't commit the crime. Shame is the ultimate deterrent; the beauty of it is the any "cruelty" is imposed by one's own conscious not the judicial system.

Aimee

posted 2/23/08 @ 3:03 PM EST

Why not just keep them all in jail forever. Every crime, no forgiveness, no redemption, no chance to live a normal life. You made a mistake, no matter how big or small, and you can never be forgiven or make amends so let's just keep them all in jail forever. We would all be so much better off. And let's not stop at felonies. If you cheated in school, that should be stamped across your drivers lisecense too. If you cheated on your spouse, that too. Lied on your tax return, scarlett letter. How's that sound? You know it is self righteous people who have made this world a meaner place to live in. We are all humans and have weakness and faults. But I guess people like you can't find it in your heart to give someone a second chance or the benfit of the doubt after being SEVERLY punished already. That's not enough for you. It's too bad that we have such unforgiving people inthis world who just make things worse with their holier than thou attitudes.





Originally posted by

By the Book

My older brother slept with his girlfriend when she was only 15 and they got pregnant; now they're married with two beautiful kids. Although he's never been charged with any sexual crime if he had been and had to get "sex offender" on his license I would support it. He knew what he was doing when he chose to have sex and so he should live with the consequences. In the air of fairness anyone convicted of any crime should have it marked on their license or ID (drunk drivers, robbers, murderers, thieves, slanderers, drug offenders); and if you don't like it don't commit the crime. Shame is the ultimate deterrent; the beauty of it is the any "cruelty" is imposed by one's own conscious not the judicial system.

Aimee

posted 2/23/08 @ 12:20 PM EST

I think you should be commended for writing an editorial that you know will get you negative feedback. However you are 100% right. Sex crimes have become so demonized over the past decade that people view EVERY sex offender as worse than a murderer. These laws are nothing but a poltitical tactic used to pretend that we are tough on crime. Almost every expert in this field agress that these laws not only don't work to prevent future crimes, they are actually making things worse. The vast majority(close to 90%) of sex offenders will not reoffend and are just trying to redeem themselves and live their lives within the law. But these laws are making it impossible and it is leading to a life of hoplesness and despair, and when people lose hope, nothing good comes of it. Good for you for speaking out against a stupid idea. And for all of you who make stupid comments that you are defending sex offenders at the expense of the victims are just ignorant and simple minded people. Nobody is minimalizing the effect on the victims. But making a sex offender live 1000 feet from a school, or stamp it across their drivers liscense, does nothing to help the victim. That is just an excuse to be vindictive and over punish sex offenders.

Andrea Godolphin

posted 2/24/09 @ 12:53 PM EST

Yes i agree with you , and nice news thanks. This realy nice news , i watch for them .
  • Displaying 1 - 9 of 9

Post Your Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Advertisements

Poll

Do you feel safe on campus?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement