College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

CFO proposes 6.3 percent tuition increase

Senior Staff Writer and Campus Correspondent

Published: Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Tuition Protest

Alisen Downey/ The Daily Campus

Students protest a proposed tuition hike outside the Dodd Center, where a town hall meeting about the increase was being held Monday.

CFO

Ryan Sayers/ The Daily Campus

UConn’s Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Richard Gray unveils the 2011 budget plan, which suggests a 6.3 percent tuition increase, at the meeting Monday. Gray’s proposal will be presented to the Board of Trustees Thursday, Feb. 18.

UConn’s Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Richard Gray, presented his plan for a 6.3 percent increase in tuition and a combined 13 percent increase for room and board for the 2011 fiscal year at a town hall meeting in the Dodd Center on Monday.


Gray’s budget proposal will be presented to the Board of Trustees at a meeting on Thursday, Feb. 18. The tuition raise is merely a proposal; last year, Gray recommended a tuition increase of 8.6 percent, but the board enacted a much lower 6 percent.


The presentation in Konover Auditorium outlined the main sources of revenue for the university. The largest portions coming from state support at 33 percent, with 46 percent from tuition, fees and room and board, and 17 percent from private supporters and grants.


Due to the poor economy and flat-state funding, the university has restricted hiring, frozen wages for the 2010 fiscal year, taken furlough days, limited purchasing and reduced other expenses including energy, said Gray. The Costs, Operations and Revenue Efficiencies (CORE) task force continues to search for alternative ways to save money. Gray pointed out that total savings from all cuts and restrictions has been $40 million.


Despite these efforts, the university predicts an approximately $20 to $40 million deficit by fiscal year 2012, said Gray. This means a projected double-digit tuition raise in fiscal year 2012, in order to balance the expected deficit.


According to Gray, some would prefer to see the tuition increase be low, continue to freeze salaries, carry on the hiring freeze, and to take more furlough days.


“With collective bargaining contracts in place, you don’t have a lot of flexibility if one of your revenue sources of support decreases,” Gray said in a press conference prior to the town hall meeting.


Sixty percent of the budget is made up of faculty benefits and salaries, Gray said. But layoffs would cause larger class sizes, and as anecdotal evidence shows, additional time to graduate, as students can’t get enrolled in required courses, Gray said. It also takes six months to a year to lay off a faculty member, and layoffs are only an option starting in fiscal year 2012, Gray said at the press conference.


The 2010-2011 fiscal years will be in balance, according to Gray, but fiscal year 2012 could be problematic, as a result of the lift in flat funding that was provided to the university as a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. In fiscal year 2012 flat funding is no longer in effect, which means major cuts in staff, raises in tuition, lower enrollment or a mixture of all three could result.


“I don’t think I’ve seen anything like this [recession] for a long time,” Gray said at the press conference. “I’m concerned […] Connecticut often lags going into a recession and coming out of a recession.”


At the town hall meeting, many students posed questions regarding the tuition increase, and where other revenue is going in the budget. There will not be a survey asking students which budget plan they prefer as there was last year due to the closing of the CSRA, Gray said.


“These tuition increases are forcing me out of here,” said Stephen Bean, a 6th-semester real estate and economics major.


In order to fund his education, Bean is a resident assistant and bus driver on campus.
Another student brought up the issue of athletics and the high salaries of the coaches on campus. Andrew Grubb, a UConn graduate student and president of the Graduate Senate, asked President Michael J. Hogan what were the benefits between athletics and academics here. Hogan said the athletic program at UConn is almost entirely self-supporting and the attention it gets brings in new students.


For the FY2012 there are a multitude of options for gaining revenue on the table, Gray said. This includes the remote possibilities of higher sporting-event ticket prices and increasing the number of out-of-state students, Gray said at the press conference.
Toward the end of the meeting Jason Ortiz, a 7th-semester public and community relations major, and commentary writer for The Daily Campus, asked university administrators to work with students to address the financial situation. Preceding the town hall meeting, Ortiz and other students played music and called attention to the meeting as students walked by.


Half of the Arjona-Monteith building replacement project will also be stalled as a result of a $140 million deferral of funds that was enacted in fiscal year 2010 by Gov. M. Jodi Rell. The second building in this project is delayed until further notice, Gray said at the press conference.


UConn has the fifth-lowest tuition among many public universities in New England, behind the flagship universities in Maine, Rhode Island, Delaware and Maryland
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

10 comments

'09n Alum
Fri Feb 12 2010 05:52
had to reply to sarah on the sports question.

The Athletics Department is entirely self-funding, no money from student tuition goes to funding any of those teams (except maybe through athletic scholarships). All the revenue for coaches salaries come from the money the teams bring in (ie the basketball and football teams). In fact a lot of what those teams make brings in money to the rest of the university.

Sports like lacrosse and field don't bring in money but they recieve their money from what the other teams make. As for the amount of teams, Title IX stipulates that equal number of male and female athletes recieve scholarship offers. If you eliminate teams you need to eliminate scholarships which would mean less students get to come to UConn. And garunted those students wouldn't be from the elite programs, but true student athletes that come to UC with no chance at a professional career in their sport.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 11 2010 14:33
I am a faculty member. I work 11-12 hour days during the work week, I work weekends, I work during "school closings," I work during "furlough days," and I work during holidays. I haven't had a week-long vacation for ten years. Given the tremendous demands on our time, many of us choose not to get married or have families -- there's just too little time in the day. I also bring in grants in the 500k to several million dollar range every couple of years, half of which goes to things like your library. To be hired here and get tenured, you generally need to be considered the best in your discipline in the entire world.

Yet I make less than the US average salary of a lawyer, doctor, construction contractor, and plumber. Many high school teachers in New England make more than me. I also spent 8 years of life in graduate school making less than 20k and amassed student loans. As a result, I have never owned a new car. I have very little retirement yet I am middle-aged.

Why do we do it? Certainly not for the money! Any one of us could work for private corporations and make 3-10 times what we make here. We teach because we truly believe in the value of education and producing unbiased scholarly research that is used by businesses around the world for free.

Do you want good faculty here and if so why would you not want to attract them with a middle or even upper middle class salary given the sacrifices they make every day? Why are the faculty the first to be skewered for "high" salaries, when their salaries are so far below the private market? I think it comes down to the fact that students have no idea what faculty do, how long they work, what they have given up in life to teach them, and how little they actually make.

J
Tue Feb 9 2010 14:43
I find this a little funny.

I remember quite vividly last year that the students had overwhelming requested a 8.6% tuition increase and the Board of Trustees had voted for a lower 6% increase. Tuition had been raised approximately 6% every year for the last 12 years (except for 2002-2003, when it was raised ~11%). The students, faculty, and staff had all requested a 8.6% tuition increase, and it was only increased 6%. Now the tuition is again going to be raised 6% and there is an "uproar" over the "excessive tuition raising." It's funny how much things can change year to year....

I also love the anger over the "excessive" salaries that our faculty/staff make. Frankly, any number that is thrown out there will seem like its excessively high (and in a lot of cases, it probably is), but I think everyone here knows that if they made 100k, we'd be clammoring for them to only make 90k, or if they made 90k to only make 80k, etc. Are they overpaid? Probably. Would in change anything in the long run if they made a little bit less? Probably not.

As for athletics, I think the point has been made several times (most notably by Jim Calhoun...) that athletics brings in a ton of money and is not state funded. It is a self-supporting division and brings recognition to a school that otherwise would be in the middle of nowhere. Athletics has literally put Storrs, CT on the map and without it I doubt that our enrollment #s would be as high as they are.

Senior Faculty do do other things than teach classes, fyi... they are also responsible for publications in nationally recognized academic journals... and most are not paid as highly as you think they are. Those that are paid highly are paid through endowments that have been donated through the UConn Foundation and not fully through state funds.

Those new TVs in the Student Union do seem completely out of place though... I'm very sure that those are completely unnecesary.

The bottom line is for the quality of education vs. the cost of other schools, UConn is a phenomenal bargain. I'm pretty sure BC or BU had a tuition raise of about 13% and have heard stories of smaller private schools increasing tuition by 26%. There is no school out there right now that is not raising tuition and it might actually be a mistake for UConn to only be raising tuition 6% and not higher.

Anonymous
Tue Feb 9 2010 10:23
I don't think the bank will load us anymore money :(
They just up the interest rate on the loan to 16.9
Sarah
Tue Feb 9 2010 09:43
Just a few questions.

Why do we have more administrators than faculty? Do we need hundreds of PR and diversity managers?

Do we need twenty sports teams in UConn? Can our coaches work for a meager salary of $200K instead of $1.5 million? How much money is brought by the softball team? By the lacrosse team?

Can our senior faculty work more than three hours a week for their meager salary of $200K? Why do we pay so high wages to some faculty if many courses are taught by TAs?

Do we need new big screen plasma TVs in the Student Union when students cannot graduate on time due to course cancellations?

Mark
Tue Feb 9 2010 09:01
good call about the Delaware/Maryland thing, anonymous. hahaha
RJL
Tue Feb 9 2010 08:30
All over the state, companies are dropping employees, invoking furloughs (unpaid days off), and salary cuts. But are the same measures seen at the University? How much does Mr. Gray make as a government official? Did he freeze all executive pay for the University? Why do they need huge pay amounts to lure professors from other institutions? Why not promote from within? What cost saving measures have been put in place this year? Automation? Waste Elimination? A lower executive to student ratio?
Anonymous
Tue Feb 9 2010 08:08
Well, perhaps President Hogan should try to cut back. How much of our money did he spend on the firework display? How much of our money is being spent to upgrade Gulley Hall with mahogany? How much of our money went into the chemicals, contractors, and wires on the two ponds to keep geese out? such a waste, and they want the staff to give more furlogh days to support his wims, i don't think so
Anonymous
Tue Feb 9 2010 01:15
Since when are Delaware and Maryland in New England
Lido Shuffler
Tue Feb 9 2010 01:10
Aren't you happy the Connecticut swept away your reserves and spent hundreds of millions of dollars in other ways on projects to buy votes and provide marginally insignificant services?






log out