Editorial: New bill harms potential for progress between U.S. and Iran
After 35 years of no formal relations, the United States and Iran are interacting again, and along with the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia, they're attempting to reach an agreement to curtail Iran's nuclear program and roll back the sanctions that have crippled the country. This is a historic moment - a chance for Iran to re-engage with the rest of the world and for the U.S. to achieve its goal of preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
Everyone involved supports a deal, with the unsurprising exceptions of Israel, Saudi Arabia and congressional Republicans. What is surprising is that several Democratic senators, including Connecticut's Richard Blumenthal, have crossed party lines to support a bill that could seriously harm the negotiations.
The bill is called the Nuclear Weapons Free Iran Act, and its main purpose is to make it quick and easy to reinstate sanctions against Iran should the negotiations fail. This may seem reasonable, but given the sensitivity of the negotiations and the provisions in the bill - which go beyond the negotiations and call for things that neither country has agreed to - the Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act is a terrible idea.
The bill essentially forces conditions for any eventual deal onto the U.S. negotiators. Many of those conditions are completely unrealistic and would most likely ruin the chances for a deal. For example, several provisions in the bill favor a "zero enrichment policy," which means that Iran would give up the right to any kind of nuclear activities, even low-grade enrichment that can't be used for weapons. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made it clear that he thinks this is the only option, but the U.S. and others in the negotiations have already ruled it out as totally unrealistic.
The bill would also require President Obama to certify every 30 days that a number of vague and equally unrealistic conditions were being met in order to keep sanctions from being reinstated.
This bill shows a lack of trust and an unwillingness to move forward. The senators sponsoring this bill claim that it supports the diplomatic process and gives the president something to bargain with, but to Iran, it may look like we've already given up a peaceful agreement with them. Suspicion, antipathy and outrageous demands are not the way to normalized relations. We can't squander this opportunity for progress.
Get Top Stories Delivered Weekly
From Around the Web
More Daily Campus News Articles
Recent Daily Campus News Articles
Discuss This Article
MOST POPULAR DAILY CAMPUS NEWS
GET TOP STORIES DELIVERED WEEKLY
FOLLOW OUR NEWSPAPER
LATEST DAILY CAMPUS NEWS
- UConn ranks first for gluten free
- #ICYMI Five Things to Know About Today's Title IX Settlement
- UConn Reaches Title IX Settlement
- Women's Soccer: Hill in camp for US ahead of U-20 World Cup
- 'One Plate, Two Plate' Coming to Student Union for Fall Semester
- Supreme Court reaches landmark decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby
- Elizabeth Park in West Hartford
RECENT DAILY CAMPUS CLASSIFIEDS
FROM AROUND THE WEB
- Shave Strokes off Your Golf Game -- Without the Eraser
- Stay Cool With a Ceiling Fan as Stylish as It Is Functional
- Have a Blast With the Family This Summer, but Stay Safe
- Chiropractic Careers Are on the Rise
- Choosing the Right Home Health Care Agency
- Pop the Champagne Diamond for Your Seasonal Fashion...
- Managing Pain: Are You Reading Your Medicine Labels?
- Does Your Garbage Want to Be Recycled?
- You Can Quit
- Pinching Penny Stocks May Be the Wise Way to Invest